๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.3/5 from 871+ reviews
Vintageโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

1988 Score Baseball lot of 8 packs

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.3 out of 5(871 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$10.48
$17.47
Sale
โœ“ no-cost distribution on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Packs are factory sealed unopened

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt dispatch
โ†ฉ๏ธ
uncomplicated Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

1988 Score Baseball lot of 8 packs

Packs are factory sealed unopened​

This product is exceptional for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 2347355

Category: Vintage > Antiques > Other

Original Price:$17.47 USD

Sale Price:$10.48 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš distribution & Returns

โœ“ at no charge dispatch on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.3
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 2780 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Cincinnati, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Totally worth it​
For the price, the 1988 Score Baseball lot of 8 packs fits my needs so no complaints. No setup issues.
26 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King
7 months ago ยท Albuquerque, NM
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Exceptional quality
After a few days, the 1988 Score Baseball lot of 8 packs feels okay so itโ€™s acceptable.
4 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Sacramento, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding!
Quality 1988 Score Baseball lot of 8 packs for everyday use.
32 people found this helpful​
JD
John Davidson โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Nashville, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding quality
Good everyday item 1988 Score Baseball lot of 8 packs.
18 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago ยท Baltimore, MD
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Fantastic product
From my experience, the 1988 Score Baseball lot of 8 packs is practical and it works for me. Works fine so far.
31 people found this helpful